Wednesday, July 13, 2016

A housing fundamental... too hard basket - again

NZ is far from alone in its housing market difficulties. Economist John Cochrane highlights research which is very relevant to NZ.
“Conor Dougherty in The New York Times has a good article on zoning laws,
"a growing body of economic literature suggests that anti-growth sentiment... is a major factor in creating a stagnant and less equal American economy.
...Unlike past decades, when people of different socioeconomic backgrounds tended to move to similar areas, today, less-skilled workers often go where jobs are scarcer but housing is cheap, instead of heading to places with the most promising job opportunities  according to research by Daniel Shoag, a professor of public policy at Harvard, and Peter Ganong, also of Harvard.
One reason they’re not migrating to places with better job prospects is that rich cities like San Francisco and Seattle have gotten so expensive that working-class people cannot afford to move there. Even if they could, there would not be much point, since whatever they gained in pay would be swallowed up by rent." 
Stop and rejoice. This is, after all, the New York Times, not the Cato Review. One might expect high housing prices to get blamed on developers, greed, or something, and the solution to be government-constructed housing, "affordable" housing mandates, rent controls, low-income housing subsidies (which protect incumbent low-income people, not those who want to move in to get better jobs) and even more restrictions.
No. The Times, the Obama Administration, California Governor Gerry Brown, have figured out that zoning laws are to blame, and they're making social stratification and inequality worse.”
David Farrar of Kiwiblog also noticed this piece, and his comment:
This is the major factor in house prices in Auckland. Labour, National, the Productivity Commission, the NZ Initiative etc all agree. We just need the Auckland Council to listen - and if they won't, to have Parliament over-rule them.

is especially pertinent.


  1. David Farrar is spruiker and propagandist for the nanny Nat Government . So why doesn't he tell them to legislate the end of urban boundaries and zoning. And while he is at it, he could remind the Government that we have noticed it is beholden to morally and intellectually criminal tribal leaders / We have a separatist Maori Party dominated government which is led by appeaser-in-chief John Key who only listens to what he has decided to hear.. . oh wait on Nanny Nat is asleep and it will take a 15% NZ First vote to wake her up.

  2. This comment has been removed by the author.